analysis

Morgan Stanley Slashes Circle Target as USDC Contracts

Editorial · Aug 3, 2026 · 8 min read

Morgan Stanley downgraded Circle to a Street-low price target of $38 on Monday morning, sending the stock down more than 6 percent in premarket trading. The analysts pulled no punches: USDC’s circulating supply is contracting, and the agentic commerce volume that bulls cite as the next growth leg amounts to roughly $41,900 in daily payment activity. That is not a typo. The number is small enough that a single moderately active human trader on Uniswap could generate it in an afternoon.

The USDC Contraction Problem

The core of Morgan Stanley’s bear case is mechanical. USDC’s market cap has been shrinking, not growing, and the trend has persisted long enough that it cannot be dismissed as a seasonal blip. Tether’s USDT has continued expanding over the same period, which means this is a Circle-specific problem rather than a stablecoin market wide contraction. The likely causes are competitive pressure from lower-fee chains where USDT dominates — Tron in particular — and the reality that Circle’s enterprise positioning has not translated into capturing new payment corridors fast enough to offset redemptions. When the largest stablecoin issuer by compliance pedigree is losing market share while its main competitor grows, the equity story gets harder to defend.

The Agentic Commerce Reality Check

The $41,900 daily agentic payments figure deserves scrutiny because it undercuts a narrative that has been building for months. Coinbase has been framing its infrastructure as the settlement layer for autonomous agents, and the x402 payment standard has generated genuine developer interest on Base. But converting developer interest into transaction volume is a different problem entirely. The number suggests that either the pipeline of production-grade agent applications is thinner than the conference circuit implies, or that the agents which do exist are settling transactions through alternative rails — including plain old API keys and traditional payment processors that never touch an on-chain stablecoin. Neither interpretation is flattering for the thesis that agentic commerce will rescue USDC growth in the near term.

The Patent Portfolio Question

Separately, Circle has acquired nearly 1,000 blockchain-related patents from IBM, a move that has drawn concern from crypto startups worried about enforcement risk. The patent trove could serve as a defensive moat — particularly if Circle attempts to assert intellectual property claims against stablecoin issuers or payment infrastructure providers. It also signals that Circle is investing in positioning itself as an enterprise-grade financial technology company rather than a pure stablecoin mint. Whether that justifies a premium valuation when the core product is contracting is precisely the question Morgan Stanley is asking. Patent portfolios do not generate revenue directly, and litigation against ecosystem participants would be self-defeating for a company whose product depends on network effects.

What to Watch

The immediate signal to monitor is whether USDC supply stabilizes or continues declining through the remainder of the quarter. If Tether keeps gaining share while Circle contracts, the gap between the two issuers will widen to a degree that makes recovery structurally difficult. The second metric is agentic payment volume: $41,900 per day needs to reach seven figures before it matters to Circle’s income statement, and the trajectory over the next two quarters will determine whether the agentic commerce thesis is real or rhetorical. The patent acquisition adds a longer-term variable that will play out over years, not weeks.

Sources

E
Editorial
Related reading

Related reading